“God Damn Haiti” From John Quincy Adams to Pat Robertson

This is why I love teaching. Today, in both my Blacks and Popular Culture class at UNC and in my Music and Political Movements class at NCCU, I discussed the Haiti crisis with my students. Quoting from yesterday’s blog post, in which I published Pat Robertson’s remarks on Haiti being damned, I suggested to my students that Robertson was using the “Devil” as a veiled metaphor to criticize and condemn the Haitian revolution. The controversial topic sparked passionate debate in both classes, and I discovered that not all of my students agreed with me. When I got home (to my delight) I found the following email in my inbox (which I am posting here with his permission):

Hi Prof. Freelon,

I am in the class and as I kept reading about Pat Robertson’s comments about Haiti and what was shared in class, I think you and the class misunderstood what he said. I think he should still be condemned for his wild remarks, but it is important not to misunderstand him. In class, you rebutted Robertson by saying that he implied that Haitians’ attempts to
free themselves from the French is making a deal with the Devil and therefore, the opposite of what he said would imply that staying in bondage would be to serve God. That’s not what he said. He said that, “And they got together and swore a pact to the Devil. They said, ‘We will serve you if you’ll get us free from the French.’ True story. And so the Devil said, Okay, it’s a deal.’ . . . But ever since they have been cursed by one thing after another.” In other words, he believes that they made a deal with the Devil to gain freedom, not that for Haitians to gain freedom is to make a deal with the Devil. Robertson’s comments allow for Haitians to gain freedom through other means, but he condemns Haitians for “[making] a deal with a Devil” to do it. Nevertheless, he’s still stupid and the class is awesome.

Sincerely, John

First off, I want to give props to John for reaching out – he’s definitely earned some extra class participation points. And even thought it’s 3am Friday morning and The Beast has two big shows in Baltimore and New York this weekend (that I should be resting for), John’s observation has inspired me so much that I can’t go to bed without delivering an articulate response. And with no further adieu..

Excellent point, John. Robertson never directly states: Haitian freedom = evil. But I would suggest that he infers as much. Indeed, he is part of a long tradition of scholars and politicians to do so. The Haitian revolution has historically been down-played for ideological, political, and ultimately economic reasons. Here’s a bit of history:

The Haitian Revolution (1804) was largely inspired by the French Revolution (1799) and American Revolution (1776). This was a time where European monarchies were overthrown by democratic governments and ideological shifts led to the development of modern principles like citizenship and inalienable rights.

However, while the French and American slave-holders were fighting for their own rights, they were not so willing to relinquish their control over over their cash-crop/property: enslaved Africans. Luckily for all of us, Haitians didn’t need their permission. Between 1791 and 1803 Toussiant Loverture and others claimed freedom by force in the largest and most successful slave revolt of all time. This shocked, bewildered and frightened Europeans and Americans. As I’m sure you can imagine, slave revolution was bad for business.

By 1804, Europe and America had already reaped MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of dollars from slave labor. Just imagine what must have been going on in their heads following the Haitian revolution. What if other colonies such as modern day Brazil, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Cuba and the USA were to follow in Haiti’s footsteps and revolt? The consequences would have been staggering and the economic blow to the West would have made 2008’s global crisis look like a mediocre day at the stock market. Furthermore, word of the Haitian Revolution traveled fast. Nat Turner, the leader of the United States’ largest Slave Rebellion sited the Haitian Revolution as his inspiration. In these revolutionary times, Europeans felt the desperate need to smother the flames of slave rebellion. In order to maintain control over their investment, Europe and America craftily engaged on a political, economic, and ideological campaign to undermine the success of Haiti and the Haitian people. Here’s how:

Spain conquered part of Haiti and established the Dominican Republic, which split the country, and the resistance. Economic embargoes were placed on Haiti to prevent her from being self-sustaining. Get this: as a pre-requisite to limited trade agreements HATIANS WERE FORCED TO PAY REPARATIONS TO FRANCE for revolting in the first place. When the Haitian government sent a letter to John Quincy Adams (the 6th President of the United States) requesting diplomatic ties between the United States and Haiti, Adams penned “not to be answered” in the margins, writing “this Union will not permit the fruits of a successful negro insurrection to be exhibited among us.” Europe NEEDED to do these things in order to make Haiti, and consequently to make slave rebellion, seem like a bad idea. The rationale was simple: “Haiti rebelled, and look at how poor they are now. If you stay with us (Europe/US), and stay in your place, we will take care of you.”

So when Pat Robertson says, “Haitians made a deal with the Devil” I see it as a perpetuation of this centuries-old myth that slave rebellion, and consequently black self-determination, is a bad thing. He essentially believes that rebellion against the white power structure is something to be discouraged, even damned by God himself. Consider Robertson’s quote with this framework in mind:

“…ever since (the revolution) they have been cursed by one thing or another, desperately poor.”

And Robertson is correct. Ever since the revolution Haitians have been desperately poor – but this is not the work of the Devil (at least not the Devil Robertson is referring to). Haitians have been desperately poor because of two centuries of calculated and systematic economic/political exclusion; from the John Quincy Adams administration to the George W. Bush Administration. Robertson goes on compare poor Haiti to their flourishing neighbors:

“The Dominican Republic is prosperous, healthy full of resorts, etc.”

This further supports my thesis. When praising the Dominican Republic, Roberton does not evoke images of “God” or the “Devil”. He simply talks about money and political economy. And as proof of prosperity he points to the Dominican Republic’s resorts – the majority of which are American/European owned and filter billions of dollars to western companies. Like a plantation, these resorts exploit the Dominican people with dependent/symbiotic relationships, in which Dominican businesses, workers and environments suffer.

There seems to be a correlation in Robertson’s judgment: if you’re making money for Europe/America and allow yourselves and your country to be controlled on their terms: you’re “prosperous,” “healthy,” and “blessed” – like the Dominican Republic. However if you rebel, like Toussiant L’overture, or like Haiti’s last president Jean-Bertrand Aristide – who has repeatedly spoken out against globalization and western institutions such as the IMF and World Bank for perpetuating debt-slavery and exploiting Africa and the Caribbean – you are condemned, and cursed. On top of that you will probably also be removed from power, which is exactly what the US Military/Bush Administration did to Aristade in 2004.

In conclusion, I don’t think Robertson actually believes that Haitians made a deal with the Devil to get free. Instead, he is one man in a loooooooong tradition of men, who have had a vested ideological, economic and political (not religious/spiritual) reasons for saying: “Damn” and “Haiti” in the same sentence.

9 Comments to ‘“God Damn Haiti” From John Quincy Adams to Pat Robertson’:

  1. Sundiata Salaam on 15 Jan 2010 at 11:16 am: 1

    Brother Pierce,

    Thank you for this riveting discussion. Let’s not also forget another important point. Vodun.

    As we know from the pronouncements of Boukman Dutty and Cecile Fatiman, the Hatian Revolution was first inspired by a Vodoun ceremony in which practictionars stated:

    Hidden God in a cloud
    Is there, watching us.
    He sees all the whites do;
    The Whitegod demands crimes
    Ours wants good things.
    But our God that is so good
    Orders vengeance, he will
    Ride us, assist us.
    Throw away the thoughts of
    The Whitegod who thirsts
    For our tears, listen to
    Freedom that speaks to our hearts

    This speech and ceremony was the precursor to the revolution. And we know from history, that any sort of Spiritual tradition that was not Christianity was a damned tradition and therefore so where the people.

    This is a wonderful post.

  2. Dana on 15 Jan 2010 at 1:33 pm: 2

    I came across this site in my quest to know the truth about the comment that struck my solemn heart for the hatian people. Thank you Prof for taking the time to share in detail what we and some our children will never learn in the public school system. I will share this story with others.

  3. Pierce on 16 Jan 2010 at 11:53 am: 3

    Vodun. That’s crucial. Thank you Salaam.

  4. Sylvia Pfeiffenberger on 16 Jan 2010 at 11:54 am: 4

    ..more reclections on Vodun:

    Hey Pierce, great analysis, but there are a few points I haven’t heard anyone make publicly. First of all, no one has pointed out the obvious logical inconsistency in Robertson’s remarks, that things were hardly going favorably for BLACKS in Haiti PRIOR to their Revolution, and supposed “pact with the Devil.” (Your analysis fills in the gaps here–… See Moreyes, it was white European interests that “prospered” economically, at the expense of enslaved Africans.) Second, I want to address the religious context. He’s clearly trying to evoke Afro-Haitian religion, Vodun, aka “voodoo” as it is familiar to the West via a vivid imaginary of stereotypes. It’s that Old Black Magic, again. The particular word Robertson uses, “cursed,” as a Biblical reference to Africa, goes way back to the Old Testament story of Ham. In Robertson’s ideological framework, these Africans were “cursed” to begin with. This is in perfect lockstep with the rhetoric of slaveholders back in the day, who used Christianity and specifically the story of Ham to justify slavery. I think it’s worth adding this log to the fire. He’s not just speaking a code for economics when he speaks of blessings and curses, but a very ancient discourse of cultural slurs against African religion and Biblical justifications for social inequality.

  5. George Greene on 27 Jan 2010 at 4:08 pm: 5

    I dispute the attribution of the “fruits of a successful” quote to John Quincy Adams. Adams was a notorious OPponent of slavery and spent much of his post-Presidential career in the House opposing the gag rule against debating slavery, and presenting petitions from citizens opposed to it.
    All such petitions were of course routinely tabled immediatey, but the point is, for years, HE KEPT presenting them. During this time, people were also offering petitions to the US to recognize Haiti, and John Quincy Adams continued to SUPPORT the cause by presenting those AS WELL. The “fruits” quote is cited more fully in
    The Journal of Negro History – Vol II—October, 1917—No. 4 in an article on Haiti and Liberia by Charles Wesley. He attributes it to Sen. Benton of Missouri, a much more likely source.
    http://thelouvertureproject.org/index.php?title=The_Struggle_for_the_Recognition_of_Haiti_and_Liberia_as_Independent_Republics
    Adams moved up from Sec.of State to the Presidency in 1825, and Benton was speaking later, and it is possible that he was echoing Adams’ earlier sentiments. But Adams himself certainly deserves credit for changing his mind from this position, even if he did originally write “not to be answered” back when he received the original petition for recognition.

  6. Roger Velasquez on 4 Feb 2010 at 11:08 am: 6

    I was taken aback by the errors and omission of historical data:

    1.- The year of the French Revolution is 1789, not 1799.

    2.- Haiti was split by the French in 1697, after 205 years of Spanish control on La Española, which was the name given by Columbus to the Quisqueya island. The treaty of Ryawick (surrendering the territory to France) was signed in 1697.

    3.- The United States was not oppossed, but in favor of Hati’s independence -not because it was a slave revolution- but because it opened the way to European ousting from the Western Hemisphere. By the time of John Quincy Adams, the “Monroe doctrine” (1823) defined the relationship with the new independent coutries, allowing the US to dominate the entire continent. Thus, the US invaded and occupied Haiti from 1915 to 1934. The exploitation by US interest in Haiti had already been going on for almost a century and its economic and political interests pervade Haiti to this day.

    4.- The curse? The Devil? It is easier to figure it out when we examine critically the historical facts, not the myths which, in this case, place the blame on the victim and glorify the culprit.

  7. Rico Sanchez on 10 Feb 2010 at 12:50 am: 7

    Roger Velasquez you are totaly off base but I will not go into details. I will just say you need go back in check your notes. Toussaint defeated a British expeditionary force in 1798, and even led an invasion of neighboring Santo Domingo, freeing the slaves there by 1801.

  8. ThydayaMiny on 5 Jan 2012 at 2:09 am: 8

    aQnhWtiRf ugg boots outlet wAmmIavQx http://peternorthcott.com

  9. Peacciree on 30 Jul 2012 at 10:27 pm: 9

     Ganz active , Marke wir einen Blick auf das mit angeschlossenem Feng Qingyang ein bisschen gedemütigt, bis schließlich plötzlich es , this bestimmten Person heißt ganz plötzlich heißt in leicht ? Chhnang Alles über Ãœber 30 Jahre Männer, der schwere Chhnang Unfälle, eingenommenen das deutliche Yang sie Wind ‘s Männer und Frauen in Yi auch angemerkt die Tatsache, dass Marke stand up zusätzlich zu schüttelte Hände während mit sowjetischen Union die Summe der, nicht überlegen du bist Personen. Songs immer bezeichnet als zum Ausdruck zu bringen, um mich mich persönlich, triumphierend tat würde, beats by dre
     zusätzlich zu I berichtete, um nicht zu sagen dass Studenten Sollte Erstellen Sie einen Freund Schatz? Zahlreiche in diesem Jahr , zurück zu etwas zu irgendeine Sache ist nicht auf der Suche nach mir mich persönlich, wirklich wirklich. Schaben unter innerhalb Chhnang wenig kleinere Nase , Feng Qingyang einige unerklärliche blickte in mühelose, diese spezifische Gentleman , wie man betrachten? wollen ihr zu können, entwickeln erwerben, oder vielleicht fokussierten am mollig gehen , sie geglaubt Fett Beitrag hören ein sehr empört und sie wehende Wind ‘s leicht zu verstehen, und jetzt wurde zu können Chengs Stress on etwa so einfach, Ihre Freundin Freunde in die Zukunft Die Idee? So einfach in der Lage sein gern | ihr Fragen, Lichtquelle Kupplung Ihre Freundin als. Flüstern in ihr Anhörung, a Ãœberspannungsschutz von erwärmte Luft Juckreiz Feng Qingyang Anhörung, Feng Qingyang Atem ein bisschen unorganisiert, fast a nie Sie gehen Choose, Sie sein sollten wach bewusst. Sie können sie konnten zusammen kommen , um diese Aktivitäten das Idee von mit angeschlossenem it der Idee? beats monster studio test
     wirklich glücklich Inhalt jetzt ? Auch dann, wenn ob es ist false nach diesem warum don’tyou machen es möglich, ihre Ihre Freundin teilnehmen in der Laien. http://www.beatsmonsterch.com

Leave a Reply

Published on January 15, 2010 at 3:25 am. 9 Comments.
Filed under diaspora,Haiti,poverty,racism.